Category: Comments


An explanation: Decca and Columbia

As I’m due to be going on holidays on Monday morning, I have two posts that will appear on the blog during next week (a labels gallery and a childrens rarity, I might do an explanation of releases made by a different branch of a record company.  In this case, Decca and Columbia (the story of Columbia records is explained at this post)

 

Whenever I refer to a recording that was released under EMI’s Columbia label, I will refer to this as a “Columbia EMI” release, while anything that was released in the U,S, will be described as an “CBS Columbia” release (in all cases except for imports, I’ll be calling these CBS releases anyway.)

Any American Decca record release that appears on this blog prior to 1952 would be released by EMI.  After 1952, Festival would release all American Decca titles until the latter 60’s (after which the label was re-branded MCA records.)  Astor would distribute these titles until 1982, after which WEA (Warner Music) would release their releases until around late 1992

Incidentally American Decca releases from the early 50’s onwards were never released under that label (only under the Festival Label)

British Decca releases (the label above is from the late 1950’s) would continue to be released by EMI until 1979, after which these titles would be released theough PolyGram until 1998 when Universal Music was founded.  Later in the year, I’ll post the Decca label from a later era.

That’s all for right now.  I’m now on hols.  My next post here will appear on Tuesday morning.

the most hard to read record label?

The title says it all for my first poll in the “off the record” blog

Most of these labels had an eye catching design, but it usually meant it would be at the expense of the legibitilty of the label

Before I get stuck into this poll, I have learned that scanning labels usually ended up making the labels lighter (and as a result easier to read.  I have now since learned to fix the colour balance)

the first (and oldest) label in the collection is the original His Masters Voice (HMV) label that was used from the 1940’s until the early 1960’s by EMI

the HMV label - 1940s until the early 1960's

the original label was a darker burgundy colour than this.

THE CARINIA COMPANY (1947-1987)

founded by Polish immigrants in 1947, and originally released recordings from Poland.  The company expanded it’s catalogue to include classical music and recordings from New Zealand based Viking Records and of course, Audio Fidelity

the Carinia Company

for nearly all of it’s LP releases this was the colour combo used (red and silver.  Although I have in my collection a version of this label in Black and Gold)

image number three comes from the Mercury Record catalogue.

Mercury Records - 1981

This label dates from around 1981, and yes it’s the single “Stars on 45″

PYE’S PLUM LABEL

the rarely seen Pye Plum Label

this one is a very rare label.  The reason being any recording that was released on the Pye label in Australia would end up appearing on Astor’s Gold series, so labels like these are rare.

While I’m at it, here is Pye’s successor, PRT (after the license was not renewed by Pye in 1980)

(note to self: never use black text on a red and green label design

Precision Records and Tapes - 1981-mid 80's

Late last year, I posted the label gallery of Hammard, and I noted about the “Aussie” label design. (in case you missed it, here it is:)

the Hammard 1980s label

And finally, the record label of Hollywood studio MGM (this was used from the late 60’s until the mid 70’s when the label was merged with the Polydor catalogue (the Yin Yang seems OK, but was a little bit too dark-ish.))

the Australian release of the MGM label

this is the final list.  Are any of these labels seem to be a little bit hard to read, or can you think of something I may have missed?  If I have, post your suggestion in the comments below.

The poll is now open, and will remain open until 23:59 on New Years Eve 2010 (Australian Eastern Standard Time, 1:59 AM for the southern states (NSW, Vic., Tas.)

BTW, you can vote two labels if you so wish.

the case of the obscured trademarks

Welcome to the first post of 2010 in the Off the Record Blog

I’m starting ths year with a very unusual story.  Throughout the late 1970’s and Early 1980’s we had the case of record retailers importing LP titles from the U.S. (this could be done provided that a similar release was not made available locally.)

A side effect of this was if they were releases by a U.S. major label, some slight modifications had to be done before they were released to retailers (such as Palings Music)

This would usually involve hiding all references to any trademarks or record labels.

All historical notes are taken from the book “The Guinness Book of Music” by Robert and Celia Dearling, with Brian Rust (Guinness Press, 2nd Edition, 1981)

Our first example is the case of the Disappearing Columbia trademark.  But first a little bit of history.

in 1931, HMV and the London branch of Columbia Gramophone Company merged to become EMI (this merger would cause headaches for CBS records when selected titles were imported to Australia.  This would also affect imports of RCA’s U.S. releases here (RCA owned the “Nipper” trademark for North America))

Of course this would mean that the U.S. office of Columbia had to be sold off due to the U.S. anti-trust laws of the time.

In 1982, Palings imported an LP under the Columbia name of Jerry Murad’s Harmonicats LP “Peg o’ My Heart” (but it could not be released under the Columbia name here because EMI owned the name back then.)

Palings decided to use a low-tech solution was to take to the cover art with a texta marker.

Below is part of the cover art for “Peg o’ My Heart”

Peg o' My Heart released on the ******** label.

not only that, all references to “Columbia” were also marked out on the back cover.

the label also suffered from obfuscation.  Below is a label for an LP released on the Columbia label.

Columbia Label (U.S.)

in this case, CBS Records Australia overlaid a sticker which was covered with the CBS records trademark.

the old 'Hide the Columbia trademark with the CBS records trademark' trick!

NIPPER NIPPED

now, for our second trademark obfuscation

the History of Nipper goes back to 1899, when artist Francis Barraud modified his painting called “His Masters Voice” changing the phonograph from a cylinder player to a disc player. thus giving birth to the familiar trademark. (which would be owned by EMI for many years to come (except in North America, where it was owned by RCA))

Throughout the 1970’s and early 1980’s, RCA’s North Ameican releases appeared with Nipper at the 2 O’Clock position on the label thus:

RCA's U.S. Red Seal (Classical Music) Label - 1970's

But when the Spike Jones compilation LP “Spike Jones is Murdering the Classics” was imported, Nipper got nipped (pun intended) in the bud by affixing a sticker in the same colour as the Red Seal label with the result being this:

Nipper go away.

a similar label hide took place on the 1981 Chipmunks LP “Urban Chipmunk” (RCA Australia never released that LP locally, so it could be duly imported.) :)

Powered by WordPress. Theme: Motion by 85ideas.